Skip to content 
When it comes to financial planning and investment management, choosing the right fee structure can significantly impact your bottom line. The two most common pricing models are the asset under management (AUM) model and the flat fee model. While both have their merits, the flat fee model offers clear financial advantages, particularly for those who want cost transparency and predictability. In a flat fee structure, clients pay a fixed, predetermined amount for ongoing financial advice and investment management services, regardless of the size of their portfolio. This can lead to substantial cost savings over time compared to the AUM model, where fees increase as the value of assets grows.
Take a typical AUM fee of 1%. For a client with a $1 million portfolio, that equates to $10,000 annually in fees. As the portfolio grows, so does the fee—without necessarily increasing the level of service provided. If that same portfolio grows to $1.5 million, the annual fee jumps to $15,000. However, the financial advice and portfolio management might not change, meaning the client is paying more for essentially the same services. In contrast, with a flat fee model, a client might pay $5,000 annually for comprehensive financial planning, regardless of whether their portfolio is worth $1 million or $1.5 million. Over time, the savings from the flat fee model can compound, keeping more of your hard-earned money invested.
Additionally, flat fee models remove the inherent conflict of interest that exists in the AUM structure. Under AUM, advisors may be incentivized to focus solely on managing assets, potentially overlooking other critical areas like tax planning, debt management, or estate planning. A flat fee ensures that the advisor’s compensation isn’t tied to asset growth, encouraging them to take a more holistic approach to your financial life. This creates a more balanced and transparent relationship where clients know exactly what they are paying for and can rest assured that their advisor is acting in their best interests.
Over the long term, the cost savings and alignment of incentives in a flat fee model often outweigh the perceived advantages of the AUM model. Clients seeking a clear, transparent, and cost-effective way to manage their finances may find that flat fees offer them better value for their money—especially as their portfolios grow. By choosing a flat fee structure, clients can focus on their long-term goals rather than watching their advisor’s fees increase with each market gain.